On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 12:25:51PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> Joseph,
> Thanks for the hint. Correcting the timestamps with...
>
> contrib/gcc_update --touch
>
> ...eliminated the failure in _Pragma.c. However I am still baffled as
> to why this was necessary since I was building from a
Joseph,
Thanks for the hint. Correcting the timestamps with...
contrib/gcc_update --touch
...eliminated the failure in _Pragma.c. However I am still baffled as
to why this was necessary since I was building from a clean svn pull
of the gcc 4.1 branch using svn 1.3.0. Is svn that broken th
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, Jack Howarth wrote:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/_Pragma3.c (test for excess errors)
This probably means your timestamps are out of order. Run
contrib/gcc_update --touch
to fix them.
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (pe
I am seeing a new failure in the gcc testsuite for the gcc 4.1
branch built on MacOS X 10.4.4...
Running
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc4-4.1.0-20060114/gcc-4.1-20060114/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/cpp.exp
...
FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/_Pragma3.c (test for excess errors)
Is this expected? None of the other archi
