On Thursday 21 April 2005 06:16, James E Wilson wrote:
> Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > Yes. wp512_process_buffer() was using 3k of stack if compiled with -O2.
> > The wp512.c I appended (sans table at top) is instrumented to show it.
> > Use "make crypto/wp512.s".
>
> See
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
Denis Vlasenko wrote:
Yes. wp512_process_buffer() was using 3k of stack if compiled with -O2.
The wp512.c I appended (sans table at top) is instrumented to show it.
Use "make crypto/wp512.s".
See
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
for info on reporting gcc bugs.
We need a testcase that we can use to
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 20:40, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Denis Vlasenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 April 2005 08:42, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > > modprobe tcrypt hangs the box on both kernels.
> > > The last printks are:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > testing wp384
> > > NNUnable to han
