--- On Mon, 5/30/11, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> From: Tobias Burnus
> Subject: Re: GCC on GPU - graphite OpenCL (was: WHOPR Linux distribution)
> To: "Robert Beeporbop"
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, "Sebastian Pop"
> Date: Monday, May 30, 2011, 5:11 AM
> On 05/30/2
On 05/30/2011 12:10 PM, Robert Beeporbop wrote:
I have some questions for the gcc developers:
Also, I had a couple other general development questions:
~ Has anyone been working on GPU support, automatically-utilized or
otherwise?
I have not used it - nor have I seen much documentation, bu
--- On Mon, 5/30/11, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:14 PM,
> Robert Beeporbop
> wrote:
> > Thank you for the information!
> >
> > So it sounds like right now, I could use 4.6.0
> (4.7.0?), and be architecture-independent between processors
> of the same type. Like, code coul
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Robert Beeporbop wrote:
> Thank you for the information!
>
> So it sounds like right now, I could use 4.6.0 (4.7.0?), and be
> architecture-independent between processors of the same type. Like, code
> could be compiled to GIMPLE with no optimization for generic
ution, everything would be
recompiled anyways, so it doesn't matter if the GIMPLE format changes.
Rob
--- On Mon, 5/30/11, Richard Guenther wrote:
> From: Richard Guenther
> Subject: Re: WHOPR Linux distribution
> To: "Robert Beeporbop"
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Date:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Robert Beeporbop wrote:
> Thanks to all the gcc developers!
>
> I am working on a Linux distribution which compiles all binaries statically
> at run-time with WHOPR. I hope to:
>
> = Have everything running insanely fast. I did some testing with a couple
> prog
Thanks to all the gcc developers!
I am working on a Linux distribution which compiles all binaries statically at
run-time with WHOPR. I hope to:
= Have everything running insanely fast. I did some testing with a couple
programs using gcc 4.5 with WHOPR and other new optimizations, and compare
