Amund Fjellheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Anyone fixing the documentation, then?
> >
> > Volunteers are always welcome.
> >
> > Ian
>
> I would but I don't think I know enough about what GCC supports and
> not. It would be better if those who do the changes make sure the
> documentation fi
Den 1. aug. 2006 kl. 20.51 skrev Ian Lance Taylor:
Amund Fjellheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anyone fixing the documentation, then?
Volunteers are always welcome.
Ian
I would but I don't think I know enough about what GCC supports and
not. It would be better if those who do the change
Amund Fjellheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone fixing the documentation, then?
Volunteers are always welcome.
Ian
> Den 1. aug. 2006 kl. 15.51 skrev Ian Lance Taylor:
>
> > Amund Fjellheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> GCC has some support for vector instructions through typedef'e
Anyone fixing the documentation, then?
Den 1. aug. 2006 kl. 15.51 skrev Ian Lance Taylor:
Amund Fjellheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GCC has some support for vector instructions through typedef'ed types
like this:
typedef int v4si __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
Some normal C operators
Amund Fjellheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> GCC has some support for vector instructions through typedef'ed types
> like this:
> typedef int v4si __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
>
> Some normal C operators can be done on these and there are some
> platform specific built in functions. The X
GCC has some support for vector instructions through typedef'ed types
like this:
typedef int v4si __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
Some normal C operators can be done on these and there are some
platform specific built in functions. The X86 functions are listed at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onli
