Re: Vandalised wiki page

2013-08-26 Thread Joel Sherrill
For the RTEMS wiki, we require a 50 word bio and manually approve accounts. It is effort to approve accounts but less than the spam clean up was. It is sad either way. --joel Dodji Seketeli wrote: Jonathan Wakely a écrit: > I've reverted or deleted all the spam I could find (and that you >

Re: Vandalised wiki page

2013-08-26 Thread Dodji Seketeli
Jonathan Wakely a écrit: > I've reverted or deleted all the spam I could find (and that you > hadn't already done) and have added lots of people to the EditorGroup > who had made good changes in the past. Thank you for doing this. It's appreciated. -- Dodji

Re: Vandalised wiki page

2013-08-25 Thread David Brown
On 23/08/13 17:59, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 23 August 2013 16:25, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: Hi - On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:06:22PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: [...] (Assuming we want to go down the ACL route.) Done! :-) Thanks. I've reverted or deleted all the spam I could find (and tha

Re: Vandalised wiki page

2013-08-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 23 August 2013 16:25, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Hi - > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:06:22PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> [...] >> (Assuming we want to go down the ACL route.) > > Done! :-) Thanks. I've reverted or deleted all the spam I could find (and that you hadn't already done) and hav

Re: Vandalised wiki page

2013-08-23 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi - On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:06:22PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > [...] > (Assuming we want to go down the ACL route.) Done! :-) > > Is there an easy way to revert a spam change to a page? I don't see one. > Doh, found it in the "more actions" dropdown. (It's only accessible there to "adm

Re: Vandalised wiki page

2013-08-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 23 August 2013 16:04, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 23 August 2013 15:44, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >> Hi - >> >>> > Looking at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/RecentChanges shows that the GCC wiki >>> > is being spammed a lot. Somebody should employ some kind of spam >>> > protection. >> >> Several other

Re: Vandalised wiki page

2013-08-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 23 August 2013 15:44, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Hi - > >> > Looking at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/RecentChanges shows that the GCC wiki >> > is being spammed a lot. Somebody should employ some kind of spam >> > protection. > > Several other sourceware-hosted moin wikis have adopted a group-ACL-bas

Re: Vandalised wiki page

2013-08-23 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi - > > Looking at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/RecentChanges shows that the GCC wiki > > is being spammed a lot. Somebody should employ some kind of spam protection. Several other sourceware-hosted moin wikis have adopted a group-ACL-based protection, which has eliminated the problem. This involves

Re: Vandalised wiki page

2013-08-23 Thread Janus Weil
>> Looking at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/RecentChanges shows that the GCC wiki >> is being spammed a lot. Somebody should employ some kind of spam protection. > > The attack is still ongoing, CC'ing overseers In fact the spam level on the wiki has been rather high for some time now, but since yesterd

Re: Vandalised wiki page

2013-08-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 23 August 2013 08:01, Václav Zeman wrote: > On 08/23/2013 12:12 AM, Alec Teal wrote: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FunctionMultiVersioning >> >> Reported by "kobrien" on the Freenode IRC network, channel #gcc just >> now, I'm just sending the message. > Looking at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/RecentCha

Re: Vandalised wiki page

2013-08-23 Thread Václav Zeman
On 08/23/2013 12:12 AM, Alec Teal wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FunctionMultiVersioning > > Reported by "kobrien" on the Freenode IRC network, channel #gcc just > now, I'm just sending the message. Looking at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/RecentChanges shows that the GCC wiki is being spammed a lot.

Vandalised wiki page

2013-08-22 Thread Alec Teal
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FunctionMultiVersioning Reported by "kobrien" on the Freenode IRC network, channel #gcc just now, I'm just sending the message. Alec