Re: Valid gimple for MEM_REF

2007-03-04 Thread Zdenek Dvorak
Hello, > > only gimple_vals (name or invariant). However, the expressions are > >matched in final_cleanup dump (after out-of-ssa and ter), so this no > >longer is the case. I think just the regular expressions need to be > >updated. > > Then IV-OPTs has an issue too but IV-OPTs dump gives: > D

Re: Valid gimple for MEM_REF

2007-03-03 Thread Andrew Pinski
On 3/3/07, Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, only gimple_vals (name or invariant). However, the expressions are matched in final_cleanup dump (after out-of-ssa and ter), so this no longer is the case. I think just the regular expressions need to be updated. Then IV-OPTs has an

Re: Valid gimple for MEM_REF

2007-03-03 Thread Zdenek Dvorak
Hello, > I noticed that gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-19.c was failing on both > powerpc-linux-gnu and powerpc64-linux-gnu: > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-19.c scan-tree-dump-times MEM.(base: &|symbol: > )a, 2 > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-19.c scan-tree-dump-times MEM.(base: &|symbol: > )c, 2 > > The reas

Valid gimple for MEM_REF

2007-03-03 Thread Andrew Pinski
I noticed that gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-19.c was failing on both powerpc-linux-gnu and powerpc64-linux-gnu: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-19.c scan-tree-dump-times MEM.(base: &|symbol: )a, 2 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-19.c scan-tree-dump-times MEM.(base: &|symbol: )c, 2 The reason why they are failing i