On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:24 PM, David Sehr wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are using gcc trunk as of 4/27/12, and are attempting to add
> support to the ARM gcc compiler for Native Client.
> We are trying to get gcc -march=armv7-a to use movw/movt consistently
> instead of minipools. The motivation is
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> It very much depends on your processor.
I suppose we are probably concerned primarily with recentish OMAP and
Tegra2 sorts of processors, but we are looking for generic good performance
solutions for ARMv7-A class processors.
> MOVW/MOVT
On 27/04/12 21:24, David Sehr wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are using gcc trunk as of 4/27/12, and are attempting to add
> support to the ARM gcc compiler for Native Client.
> We are trying to get gcc -march=armv7-a to use movw/movt consistently
> instead of minipools. The motivation is for
> a new t
Hello All,
We are using gcc trunk as of 4/27/12, and are attempting to add
support to the ARM gcc compiler for Native Client.
We are trying to get gcc -march=armv7-a to use movw/movt consistently
instead of minipools. The motivation is for
a new target variant where armv7-a is the minimum supporte
