Re: Using LTO-enabled libgfortran

2016-08-17 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Am 16.08.2016 um 20:57 schrieb Richard Biener: >> >> On August 16, 2016 7:11:26 PM GMT+02:00, Thomas Koenig >> wrote: >>> >>> What would it take to use an LTO-enabled version of gfortran? >>> >>> It could turn out to be quite useful for spee

Re: Using LTO-enabled libgfortran

2016-08-16 Thread Thomas Koenig
Am 16.08.2016 um 20:57 schrieb Richard Biener: On August 16, 2016 7:11:26 PM GMT+02:00, Thomas Koenig wrote: What would it take to use an LTO-enabled version of gfortran? It could turn out to be quite useful for speeding up programs, especially where I/O or array intrinsics are used. I also

Re: Using LTO-enabled libgfortran

2016-08-16 Thread Richard Biener
On August 16, 2016 7:11:26 PM GMT+02:00, Thomas Koenig wrote: >What would it take to use an LTO-enabled version of gfortran? > >It could turn out to be quite useful for speeding up programs, >especially where I/O or array intrinsics are used. > >I also expect many issues to surface where libgfort

Using LTO-enabled libgfortran

2016-08-16 Thread Thomas Koenig
What would it take to use an LTO-enabled version of gfortran? It could turn out to be quite useful for speeding up programs, especially where I/O or array intrinsics are used. I also expect many issues to surface where libgfortran is playing with types in a way that could break LTO, so I would n