Adrian Prantl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Another question is whether there is actually a need to carry around the two
> concepts of BYTES and UNITS anyway. It seems that for most backends those
> are of the same size anyway, and for the other backends it would be much
> easier if there were onl
Adrian Prantl wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am currently working on creating a new gcc backend for a word-addressable
machine with 24-Bit general purpose registers.
While doing so I came across a few inconsistencies regarding the usage of the
BITS_PER_UNIT Macro. (and UNITS_PER_WORD, in a related st
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Adrian Prantl wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am currently working on creating a new gcc backend for a word-addressable
> machine with 24-Bit general purpose registers.
If the smallest unit you can address, the one between
address N and N+1, is a "word" then the unit must be a
Hello everybody,
I am currently working on creating a new gcc backend for a word-addressable
machine with 24-Bit general purpose registers.
While doing so I came across a few inconsistencies regarding the usage of the
BITS_PER_UNIT Macro. (and UNITS_PER_WORD, in a related story)
Apparently a lot