gal will not help the user at all that probably doesn’t know any
> assembler language.
>
> I would like to drop this test in tiny-asm, but I am not 100% sure that it is
> really redundant. The checks are expensive to do, and they are done at EACH
> instruction...
>
> In t
this test in tiny-asm, but I am not 100% sure that it is
really redundant. The checks are expensive to do, and they are done at EACH
instruction...
In the other hand, if the assembler doesn’t catch a faulty instruction, the
user will know that at runtime (maybe) with an illegal instruction
said, now I have some questions:
1) What kind of options does gcc pass to its assembler? Is there in the huge
source tree of gcc a place where those options are emitted?
This would allow me to keep only those options into tiny-asm and erase all
others (and the associated code)
2) I have to re
