Re: Thoughts on gcc maintainership and project merging

2006-06-11 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Zdenek Dvorak wrote: >Proposal: Whenever a new pass or a major functionality is added to > gcc, a maintainer for it must be found. Preferably the > author, or in case he from some reason is not considered > suitable, some other person m

Re: Thoughts on gcc maintainership and project merging

2006-05-24 Thread Zdenek Dvorak
Hello, > On May 24, 2006, at 7:47 AM, Zdenek Dvorak wrote: > >Obviously, there is no perfect solution for this problem. However, > >here > >are several ideas for proposals that I believe could help: > > > >1) > > > > Proposal: Whenever a new pass or a major functionality is added to > >

Re: Thoughts on gcc maintainership and project merging

2006-05-24 Thread Andrew Pinski
On May 24, 2006, at 7:47 AM, Zdenek Dvorak wrote: Obviously, there is no perfect solution for this problem. However, here are several ideas for proposals that I believe could help: 1) Proposal: Whenever a new pass or a major functionality is added to gcc, a maintainer

Thoughts on gcc maintainership and project merging

2006-05-24 Thread Zdenek Dvorak
Hello, I have read the mail of Steven Bosscher (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00272.html), and while IMO he takes the situation too personally, he raises several interesting points. In particular, some of the statements remind me of my own experiences with the work on loop optimize