Re: The new gcc_release script hasn't been pushed to production

2005-11-04 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 01:07 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Kelley Cook wrote: > > > > > Snapshots haven't been created since 10/29. > > > > I updated the one gccadmin uses yesterday. > > look in /home/gccadmin/scripts

Re: The new gcc_release script hasn't been pushed to production

2005-11-04 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Kelley Cook wrote: > > > Snapshots haven't been created since 10/29. > > I updated the one gccadmin uses yesterday. > look in /home/gccadmin/scripts I haven't seen the changes on gcc-patches yet. -- Joseph S. Myers

Re: The new gcc_release script hasn't been pushed to production

2005-11-04 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Kelley Cook wrote: Snapshots haven't been created since 10/29. I updated the one gccadmin uses yesterday. look in /home/gccadmin/scripts Looks like the version of gcc_release running on gcc.gnu.org is still the old CVS based one. gcc_release: Tagging sources as gcc

The new gcc_release script hasn't been pushed to production

2005-11-04 Thread Kelley Cook
Snapshots haven't been created since 10/29. Looks like the version of gcc_release running on gcc.gnu.org is still the old CVS based one. > gcc_release: Tagging sources as gcc-ss-4_0-20051103 > cvs [export aborted]: no such tag gcc-ss-4_0-20051103 > cvs [rtag aborted]: could not open lock file