On 13 April 2012 16:58, Rick Hodgin wrote:
> --- On Fri, 4/13/12, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> > I was wondering if anyone had a response to this? No
>> > one responded on- or off-list, which was both surprising
>> > and confusing.
>> Why? What sort of response were you expecting?
>
> I didn't have
--- On Fri, 4/13/12, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone had a response to this? No
> > one responded on- or off-list, which was both surprising
> > and confusing.
> Why? What sort of response were you expecting?
I didn't have a particular expectation (outside of just some kind
On 13 April 2012 00:26, Rick Hodgin wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone had a response to this? No one responded on- or
> off-list, which was both surprising and confusing.
Why? What sort of response were you expecting?
What has GCC or GNU got to do with "fraternity between nations, for
the abol
I was wondering if anyone had a response to this? No one responded on- or
off-list, which was both surprising and confusing.
Thanks! :-)
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
--- On Sun, 4/8/12, Rick Hodgin wrote:
> From: Rick Hodgin
>
> ...I think [GCC] is, without a doubt, the best GNU
> project
nominating Richard Stallman for the Nobel Peace
Prize (seriously)?
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
--- On Sun, 4/8/12, Oleg Endo wrote:
> From: Oleg Endo
> Subject: Re: Switch statement case range
> To: "Rick Hodgin"
> Cc: "Marek Polacek" , "gcc"
> D
On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 09:07 -0700, Rick Hodgin wrote:
> Thank you!
>
> I'd like to find out some day exactly how much I _don't_ know. :-)
>
Knock yourself out ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C-Extensions.html
Cheers,
Oleg
Thank you!
I'd like to find out some day exactly how much I _don't_ know. :-)
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
--- On Sun, 4/8/12, Marek Polacek wrote:
> From: Marek Polacek
> Subject: Re: Switch statement case range
> To: "Rick Hodgin"
> Cc: "gcc"
&g
On 4/8/2012 11:59 AM, Rick Hodgin wrote:
What are the possibilities of adding a GCC extension to allow:
switch (foo) {
case 1:
case 2:
case 3 to 8:
case 9:
default:
}
in C/C++ case statements?
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
I think there is very little enthusiasm these days for adding
non-stan
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 08:59:46AM -0700, Rick Hodgin wrote:
> What are the possibilities of adding a GCC extension to allow:
>
> switch (foo) {
> case 1:
> case 2:
> case 3 to 8:
> case 9:
> default:
> }
This already exists (and is a GNU extension):
switch (foo)
{
case 1:
break;
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Rick Hodgin wrote:
> What are the possibilities of adding a GCC extension to allow:
>
> switch (foo) {
> case 1:
> case 2:
> case 3 to 8:
> case 9:
> default:
> }
>
> in C/C++ case statements?
GCC used to have a range extension for case:
case 3..8
which has b
What are the possibilities of adding a GCC extension to allow:
switch (foo) {
case 1:
case 2:
case 3 to 8:
case 9:
default:
}
in C/C++ case statements?
Best regards,
Rick C. Hodgin
11 matches
Mail list logo
