On 4/7/20 4:09 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Hi -
There's update SVN to GIT map file:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DMuFDu476stLdMxKSaDzv4c81rhMAGEI/view?usp=sharing
Updated.
Thanks. I can form https://gcc.gnu.org/r12345 works right now.
Martin
- FChE
Hi -
> There's update SVN to GIT map file:
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DMuFDu476stLdMxKSaDzv4c81rhMAGEI/view?usp=sharing
Updated.
- FChE
On 4/7/20 9:29 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 4/7/20 9:22 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Apr 07 2020, Martin Liška wrote:
Can you please help me how can one clone (or pull) complete content of git repo?
Easiest way is to do a mirror clone.
All right, --mirror is a new option to me.
There's upd
On 4/7/20 9:22 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Apr 07 2020, Martin Liška wrote:
Can you please help me how can one clone (or pull) complete content of git repo?
Easiest way is to do a mirror clone.
All right, --mirror is a new option to me.
Doing that.
Thanks,
Martin
Andreas.
On Apr 07 2020, Martin Liška wrote:
> Can you please help me how can one clone (or pull) complete content of git
> repo?
Easiest way is to do a mirror clone.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1
"And now for
On 4/6/20 5:04 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020, Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
That is r105377 till r105390 was only ever done on a test SVN repo and
r105927 (hooks) was the first commit to SVN after the conversion from
Actually r105926 (creating the hooks directory) was the first co
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020, Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
> That is r105377 till r105390 was only ever done on a test SVN repo and
> r105927 (hooks) was the first commit to SVN after the conversion from
Actually r105926 (creating the hooks directory) was the first commit in
the real SVN conversion. But
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:15 AM Andreas Schwab via Overseers
wrote:
>
> On Apr 06 2020, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:46:34AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> >> On 4/6/20 10:37 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:09:24AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On Apr 06 2020, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:46:34AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 4/6/20 10:37 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:09:24AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> > > On 4/6/20 1:57 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>> > > > Hi -
>> > > >
>> >
On 4/6/20 10:55 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:46:34AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 4/6/20 10:37 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:09:24AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 4/6/20 1:57 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Hi -
Courtesy of a lovely httpd RewriteMap-
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:46:34AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 4/6/20 10:37 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:09:24AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> > > On 4/6/20 1:57 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > > > Hi -
> > > >
> > > > Courtesy of a lovely httpd RewriteMap-basd hack c
On 4/6/20 10:37 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:09:24AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 4/6/20 1:57 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Hi -
Courtesy of a lovely httpd RewriteMap-basd hack courtesy of Martin, we
have all the svn r# redirects working, and faster than before.
Gre
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:09:24AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 4/6/20 1:57 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > Hi -
> >
> > Courtesy of a lovely httpd RewriteMap-basd hack courtesy of Martin, we
> > have all the svn r# redirects working, and faster than before.
>
> Great. Thank you applicatio
On 4/6/20 1:57 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Hi -
Courtesy of a lovely httpd RewriteMap-basd hack courtesy of Martin, we
have all the svn r# redirects working, and faster than before.
Great. Thank you application of the RewriteMap!
Martin
- FChE
Hi -
Courtesy of a lovely httpd RewriteMap-basd hack courtesy of Martin, we
have all the svn r# redirects working, and faster than before.
- FChE
On 4/3/20 10:19 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Hi -
https://gcc.gnu.org/r2000
maps to a search and you get thousands of hits for SVN: r2000**
The gcc git svn-rev alias handles that (and also handles release and other
branches) using approx.
git log --all --grep="From-SVN: r$rev\b" | head -n 1 |
Hi -
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/r2000
> > > maps to a search and you get thousands of hits for SVN: r2000**
> >
> > The gcc git svn-rev alias handles that (and also handles release and other
> > branches) using approx.
> > git log --all --grep="From-SVN: r$rev\b" | head -n 1 | awk '{print $2}'
> >
On 4/3/20 11:23 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 4/3/20 10:54 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:38:17AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
The gcc git svn-rev alias handles that (and also handles release and other
branches) using approx.
git log --all --grep="From-SVN: r$rev\b" | head -n 1
On 4/3/20 10:54 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:38:17AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
The gcc git svn-rev alias handles that (and also handles release and other
branches) using approx.
git log --all --grep="From-SVN: r$rev\b" | head -n 1 | awk '{print $2}'
where $rev is 2000 in
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:38:17AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> > The gcc git svn-rev alias handles that (and also handles release and other
> > branches) using approx.
> > git log --all --grep="From-SVN: r$rev\b" | head -n 1 | awk '{print $2}'
> > where $rev is 2000 in your case.
> >
> > Jaku
On 4/2/20 2:26 PM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 02:19:10PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Am 20.03.20 um 18:37 schrieb Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc:
Hi -
Both svn: and ssh+svn: now work for your archeological needs.
Further, URLs such as
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279
On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 02:19:10PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Am 20.03.20 um 18:37 schrieb Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc:
> > Hi -
> >
> > Both svn: and ssh+svn: now work for your archeological needs.
> > Further, URLs such as
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279160&root=gcc&view=rev
> >
Am 20.03.20 um 18:37 schrieb Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc:
Hi -
Both svn: and ssh+svn: now work for your archeological needs.
Further, URLs such as
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279160&root=gcc&view=rev
https://gcc.gnu.org/r123456
are mapped to gitweb searches that try to locate the matching
Fro
Hi.
The suggested approach expect that the revision belongs to master
branch. Which is not the case for branch commits like:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91601#c11
Link:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=275301&root=gcc&view=rev
Thank you,
Martin
Hi -
> [...]
> On a related note, contribute.html has a link to
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/contrib/check_GNU_style.sh?view=markup
> and gcc-4.8/changes.html has a linkto
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/libgfortran/libgfortran.h?content-type=text%2Fplain&view=co
> which are broken
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Frank Ch. Eigler via Overseers wrote:
> Both svn: and ssh+svn: now work for your archeological needs.
> Further, URLs such as
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279160&root=gcc&view=rev
> https://gcc.gnu.org/r123456
>
> are mapped to gitweb searches that try to locate the ma
On 3/24/20 12:06 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>> Thanks for working on this!!! However, I still see at least one issue
>> in the following bugzilla entry:
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94123#c4
>>
>> The first two git style links work, but the last one which points
>> to th
Hi -
> Thanks for working on this!!! However, I still see at least one issue
> in the following bugzilla entry:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94123#c4
>
> The first two git style links work, but the last one which points
> to the SVN revision doesn't. Is that a bug in th
On 3/20/20 12:37 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Both svn: and ssh+svn: now work for your archeological needs.
> Further, URLs such as
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279160&root=gcc&view=rev
> https://gcc.gnu.org/r123456
>
> are mapped to gitweb searches that try to locate th
Hi -
Both svn: and ssh+svn: now work for your archeological needs.
Further, URLs such as
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=279160&root=gcc&view=rev
https://gcc.gnu.org/r123456
are mapped to gitweb searches that try to locate the matching
From-SVN: rABCDEF commit. This way, historical URLs from bu
On 11:05 Thu 08 Apr , Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 7 April 2010 23:52, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > Has anyone else seen this error from trunk?
> >
> > $ svn status
> > svn: Error at entry 15 in entries file for 'gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn':
> > svn: Bogus date
>
> Then entries file for th
On 7 April 2010 23:52, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> Has anyone else seen this error from trunk?
>
> $ svn status
> svn: Error at entry 15 in entries file for 'gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn':
> svn: Bogus date
Then entries file for that directory is perhaps in g++.dg/.svn/. Have
you tried deleting all
Has anyone else seen this error from trunk?
$ svn status
svn: Error at entry 15 in entries file for 'gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn':
svn: Bogus date
Even if I delete the gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn tree, an update brings
the error back.
svn is 1.6.9.
--
Andrew :-)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat
33 matches
Mail list logo
