Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline

2009-07-14 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Diego Novillo wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/criteria.html > > Thanks. I've filtered the non-ELF platforms from both lists to get this: You should test LTO-enabled cross tools from a non-ELF primary or secondary host to an ELF primary or secondary target, as well as

Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline

2009-07-13 Thread Diego Novillo
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 06:42, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >> Primary >> >>     * i386-unknown-freebsd >>     * i686-pc-linux-gnu >>     * mipsisa64-elf >>     * powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu >>     * sparc-sun-solaris2.10 >>     * x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > > your non-elf filter has been too agressive.

Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline

2009-07-13 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 08:11 -0400, Diego Novillo wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 03:15, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Diego Novillo wrote: > > > >> 4- Test on primary and secondary platforms. What is the current > >>suggested list of platforms? > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4

Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline

2009-07-08 Thread Diego Novillo
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 03:15, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Diego Novillo wrote: > >> 4- Test on primary and secondary platforms.  What is the current >>    suggested list of platforms? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/criteria.html Thanks. I've filtered the non-ELF platforms from bot

Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline

2009-07-08 Thread Kaveh R. GHAZI
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Diego Novillo wrote: > 4- Test on primary and secondary platforms. What is the current >suggested list of platforms? http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/criteria.html

Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline

2009-07-07 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:31 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Diego Novillo wrote: > >> 4- Test on primary and secondary platforms.  What is the current >>   suggested list of platforms? >> >> Any and all help I can get with #2 and #4 will be appreciated. >> For #2, I need to tri

Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline

2009-07-07 Thread Diego Novillo
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 09:31, H.J. Lu wrote: > I have been testing LTO on Linux/ia32 and Linux/x86-64. > I had to disable LTO test on Linux/ia64 since it miscompiled > several Java testcases into infinite loops. I can try to find out > which checkin caused this if needed. Thanks, that would be in

Re: Status of LTO merge to mainline

2009-07-07 Thread H.J. Lu
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Diego Novillo wrote: > 4- Test on primary and secondary platforms.  What is the current >   suggested list of platforms? > > Any and all help I can get with #2 and #4 will be appreciated. > For #2, I need to triage the reports to see which ones can be > closed alrea

Status of LTO merge to mainline

2009-07-07 Thread Diego Novillo
I am working on the last 60 testsuite failures on x86_64, but I'm sure there will be other failures in other architectures. My merge plan is: 1- Fix the remaining failures on x86_64. This includes fixing thunks for vararg functions which I plan to address as outlined in http://gcc.gnu.org/