edhat.com/blog/2021/01/28/static-analysis-updates-in-gcc-11/
> >
> > Hope this is of interest
> > Dave
> >
> >
>
> Thanks for the post! One nit: the post says: "Each of these
> corresponds to a pre-existing warning implemented in the C and C++
> front end
On 29/01/2021 01:03, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 1/28/21 2:27 PM, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote:
On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 22:06 +0100, David Brown wrote:
I wrote a feature request for gcc a while back, involving adding tag
attributes to functions in order to ensure that certain classes of
functions ar
tatic-analysis-updates-in-gcc-11/
As a gcc user, I am always glad to hear of more static analysis and
static warning work. My own work is mostly on small embedded
systems,
where "malloc" and friends are severely frowned upon in any case and
there is no file system, so most of the gc
01/28/static-analysis-updates-in-gcc-11/
As a gcc user, I am always glad to hear of more static analysis and
static warning work. My own work is mostly on small embedded
systems,
where "malloc" and friends are severely frowned upon in any case and
there is no file system, so most of the gc
On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 22:06 +0100, David Brown wrote:
> On 28/01/2021 21:23, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote:
> > I wrote a blog post covering what I've been working on in the
> > analyzer
> > in this release:
> >
> > https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2021/0
On 28/01/2021 21:23, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote:
> I wrote a blog post covering what I've been working on in the analyzer
> in this release:
>
> https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2021/01/28/static-analysis-updates-in-gcc-11/
>
As a gcc user, I am always glad to hear of
I wrote a blog post covering what I've been working on in the analyzer
in this release:
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2021/01/28/static-analysis-updates-in-gcc-11/
Hope this is of interest
Dave
