Joseph Myers :
> My question is: is it a stable interface to reposurgeon that the portions
> of such a split commit will always be numbered in lexicographical order by
> branch name (or some other such well-defined stable ordering), so I can
> write <80870.2> in gcc.lift and know that some repos
I'm testing a gcc-conversion patch to implement the branchpoint fixes I
identified for GCC branches where cvs2svn chose a bad parent for the
branch-creation commit.
With that patch, I see:
# /branches/gcc-3_4-rhl-branch
<80870>|<81014> reparent --use-order
reposurgeon: couldn't match a name at