Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically

On Sat, Jun 22, 2024 at 01:00:54PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Am 22.06.24 um 10:46 schrieb Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus: > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 09:50:43PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > > > > > > > > > Am 17.06.24 um 21:13 schrieb Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc: > > > > Hi all, >

Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 09:50:43PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > > > Am 17.06.24 um 21:13 schrieb Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm trying to add an alternative to an existing insn foobar: > > > > (define_insn "foobar" > >[(set (match_operand ...) > >

Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically

Am 22.06.24 um 10:46 schrieb Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus: On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 09:50:43PM +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: Am 17.06.24 um 21:13 schrieb Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc: Hi all, I'm trying to add an alternative to an existing insn foobar: (define_insn "foobar" [(set

Re: Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically

Am 17.06.24 um 21:13 schrieb Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc: Hi all, I'm trying to add an alternative to an existing insn foobar: (define_insn "foobar" [(set (match_operand ...) (match_operand ...))] "" "@ foo bar #") Since the asm output depends on the op

Setting insn mnemonic partly automagically

Hi all, I'm trying to add an alternative to an existing insn foobar: (define_insn "foobar" [(set (match_operand ...) (match_operand ...))] "" "@ foo bar #") Since the asm output depends on the operands in a non-trivial way which isn't easily solved via iterators, I went fo