Re: S390 should change the meaning of -m31

2021-10-08 Thread Paul Edwards via Gcc
; jesusantonio30122...@gmail.com Subject: S390 should change the meaning of -m31 Hi Michael. Thanks for picking up this issue. I have been working with Jesus on this. m31 is semantically the same as the m32 option. The m31 option allows for 32 bit addressing and that is confusing since the m31 o

S390 should change the meaning of -m31

2021-09-30 Thread Paul Edwards via Gcc
Hi Michael. Thanks for picking up this issue. I have been working with Jesus on this. m31 is semantically the same as the m32 option. The m31 option allows for 32 bit addressing and that is confusing since the m31 option in S390 would mean 2 GiB space addressing Indeed that's exactly what

Re: S390 should change the meaning of -m31

2021-09-30 Thread Michael Matz via Gcc
Hello, On Wed, 29 Sep 2021, Jesus Antonio via Gcc wrote: > m31 is semantically the same as the m32 option. > > > The m31 option allows for 32 bit addressing and that is confusing since > the m31 option in S390 would mean 2 GiB space addressing Indeed that's exactly what it means, and what it'

S390 should change the meaning of -m31

2021-09-29 Thread Jesus Antonio via Gcc
m31 is semantically the same as the m32 option. The m31 option allows for 32 bit addressing and that is confusing since the m31 option in S390 would mean 2 GiB space addressing but it allows for 32 bit addressing, this is awkward, not only because the option is misleading but is also incorrec