Re: Request for clarification on how a contribution to gcc can be made

2010-12-13 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Thomas Klein writes: > To me it looks like that what is described in the online document > is either not correct or is > being misinterpreted at least by me. > It's not clear to me at which point the FSF is trusting an individual > (or organization or company

Re: Request for clarification on how a contribution to gcc can be made

2010-12-13 Thread Robert Dewar
On 12/13/2010 12:57 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote: On 12/13/2010 07:27 PM, Thomas Klein wrote: It's not clear to me at which point the FSF is trusting an individual (or organization or company) and why it is mistrusting an individual per default. My understanding is that the FSF wants to own the cod

Re: Request for clarification on how a contribution to gcc can be made

2010-12-13 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 12/13/2010 07:27 PM, Thomas Klein wrote: It's not clear to me at which point the FSF is trusting an individual (or organization or company) and why it is mistrusting an individual per default. My understanding is that the FSF wants to own the code completely,* which allows it to re-license

Request for clarification on how a contribution to gcc can be made

2010-12-13 Thread Thomas Klein
Hello To me it looks like that what is described in the online document is either not correct or is being misinterpreted at least by me. It's not clear to me at which point the FSF is trusting an individual (or organization or company) and why it is mistru