On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 01:56:48PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > I haven't tested it extensively but it triggers at least for the current
> > > case.
> > > I would have loved to also print the insn but couldn't figure ou
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 01:56:48PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > I haven't tested it extensively but it triggers at least for the current
> > case.
> > I would have loved to also print the insn but couldn't figure out how to ICE
> > and stringify an insn. I will have a look at this tomorrow. Did yo
On 8/8/24 10:26 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
Since you installed this idea into my brain, I gave it a try. Maybe something
along the lines:
rtx orig_reg = regno_reg_rtx[regno];
machine_mode m1 = GET_MODE (orig_reg);
machine_mode m2 = GE
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 07:57:43AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 8/8/24 6:26 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 06:03:13AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/8/24 5:15 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > However `(r
On 8/8/24 6:26 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 06:03:13AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 8/8/24 5:15 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc wrote:
However `(reg:DI 61 [ MEM[(const union T *)p_2(D)] ])` referencing the
same pseudo in a different mode is not subs
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 06:03:13AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 8/8/24 5:15 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc wrote:
>
> >
> > However `(reg:DI 61 [ MEM[(const union T *)p_2(D)] ])` referencing the
> > same pseudo in a different mode is not substituted in insn 6 which
> > leads in the
On 8/8/24 5:15 AM, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus via Gcc wrote:
However `(reg:DI 61 [ MEM[(const union T *)p_2(D)] ])` referencing the
same pseudo in a different mode is not substituted in insn 6 which
leads in the following to an error. The insn is emitted in
s390_expand_insv() during
There
Hi all,
While trying to fix the failing test gcc.dg/torture/pr111821.c on s390 I'm
stumbling across another problem. After ira we have
(note 4 1 18 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(insn 18 4 2 2 (set (reg:DI 66)
(reg:DI 2 %r2 [ p ])) "/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr111821.c":5:1
1503 {
