For me the strategy that worked was:
1) Find out who can sign the document. Sometimes someone can sign on
behalf of some important and busy person. Don't leave this task to
someone else, otherwise the document will be jumping from office to
office and will get lost.
2) Go directly to the person
Le Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:19:16PM +0100, basile écrivait/wrote:
> on Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 11:53:29PM +0200, I (Basile S.) asked
>
> > There are several topics that I wish to be covered a bit on the Wiki (or
> > some other documentations), mostly related to configuration (and autoconf,
> > with wh
On 08 November 2006 16:19, 'Ralf Wildenhues' wrote:
> * Dave Korn wrote on Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:59:34PM CET:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
> [...]
>> You don't really "get" wiki, do you? ;-)
>
> Oh, I didn't know this wiki was editable by anybody.
> I mistakenly inferre
* Dave Korn wrote on Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 04:59:34PM CET:
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
[...]
> You don't really "get" wiki, do you? ;-)
Oh, I didn't know this wiki was editable by anybody.
I mistakenly inferred from notices on other wiki pages
that there are restrictions a
On 08 November 2006 12:25, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Basile,
>
> * Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote on Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:19:16PM CET:
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
> If you need a [ ... ]
> The first chapter of the Automake 1.10 manual [ ... ]
> The Autobook and the
Hello Basile,
* Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote on Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:19:16PM CET:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AboutGCCConfiguration
>
> I borrowed a few sentences elsewhere, in particular from the autobook
> http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/ by Gary V. Vaughan, Ben Elliston,
> Tom Tromey and
on Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 11:53:29PM +0200, I (Basile S.) asked
> There are several topics that I wish to be covered a bit on the Wiki (or
> some other documentations), mostly related to configuration (and autoconf,
> with which I am not very familiar, especially in the context of GCC whose
> config
> 0. I am not sure to understand exactly the steps (and commands to
> run) when touching to a configure.ac file... I made an educated
> guess which happens to work most of the time. (In particular it
> seems that autconf2.60 works even if 2.59 is required)
If you only modify `configure.ac', then i
