> On 11 November 2012 21:57, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > Here is what I did with gmp :
> >
> > $ ls $SRC/gmp*
> > /usr/local/src/gmp-5.0.5.tar.bz2
> >
> > $ /opt/schily/bin/star -x -bz -xdir -xdot -U -fs=16m
> > file=/usr/local/src/gmp-5.0.5.tar.bz2
> > star: 1262 blocks + 0 bytes (total of 12922880
On 11 November 2012 21:57, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Here is what I did with gmp :
>
> $ ls $SRC/gmp*
> /usr/local/src/gmp-5.0.5.tar.bz2
>
> $ /opt/schily/bin/star -x -bz -xdir -xdot -U -fs=16m
> file=/usr/local/src/gmp-5.0.5.tar.bz2
> star: 1262 blocks + 0 bytes (total of 12922880 bytes = 12620.00k)
> > What isn't clear is where that is run. I decided that I will take your
> > approach and try to follow the magic incantations to the very
> letter. OKay,
> > sort of. I may expand on the CFLAGS just a little bit and I have to
> assume,
> > in the absence of any data, that I shall run these "c
> What isn't clear is where that is run. I decided that I will take your
> approach and try to follow the magic incantations to the very letter. OKay,
> sort of. I may expand on the CFLAGS just a little bit and I have to assume,
> in the absence of any data, that I shall run these "config ; make; m
> > The last (very annoying) issue is that when gcc bootstraps itself, the
> > freshly-built compiler doesn't generate 64-bit binaries by default.
> > BOOT_CFLAGS can work around that: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html.
>
> That isn't true at all.
okay .. I'll just nod my head and agree.
>
> > The last (very annoying) issue is that when gcc bootstraps itself, the
> > freshly-built compiler doesn't generate 64-bit binaries by default.
> > BOOT_CFLAGS can work around that: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html.
>
> That isn't true at all.
>
> > CC='cc -m64' CXX='CC -m64' ../gmp-5.0.
> The last (very annoying) issue is that when gcc bootstraps itself, the
> freshly-built compiler doesn't generate 64-bit binaries by default.
> BOOT_CFLAGS can work around that: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html.
That isn't true at all.
> CC='cc -m64' CXX='CC -m64' ../gmp-5.0.1-src/configure
On 10 November 2012 22:08, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> You know, somehow I'd missed that gcc would build the numerical libs for you
> if they were in tree... I'd only heard about the host tools (binutils,
> etc.). Does it do the same for all deps (e.g. readline) as well?
No.
The contrib/download_prereq
On 10/11/2012 4:54 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 10 November 2012 20:51, Dennis Clarke wrote:
So 32-bit gcc works just fine. However I need a pile of libs all over the
place ( gmp, mpfr, mpc, etc etc ) for this to work
No you don't. If you put gmp, mpfr and mpc in the GCC source tree, or
ins
On 10 November 2012 20:51, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> So 32-bit gcc works just fine. However I need a pile of libs all over the
> place ( gmp, mpfr, mpc, etc etc ) for this to work
No you don't. If you put gmp, mpfr and mpc in the GCC source tree, or
install them with --disable-shared, then you d
On 10/11/2012 3:51 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Eric wrote:
Any pointers at all as to the error of my ways ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
You're up against three factors here. First, the sparc64 platform ABI
specifies 32-bit executables unless the user specifically a
> Eric wrote:
> > > Any pointers at all as to the error of my ways ?
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
> You're up against three factors here. First, the sparc64 platform ABI
> specifies 32-bit executables unless the user specifically asks for
> 64-bit. I'm real
Eric wrote:
> Any pointers at all as to the error of my ways ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
You're up against three factors here. First, the sparc64 platform ABI
specifies 32-bit executables unless the user specifically asks for
64-bit. I'm really unclear on why
> I can not see my error here and am wondering what the issue is.
Obviously, if you have 32-bit object files in your build tree, you're using a
32-bit compiler. Which very likely means that you didn't set CC and CXX.
--
Eric Botcazou
> > nope. Been there .. done that and that fails badly .. in fact worse
> than
> > before :
>
> Yet this is the standard way and works flawlessly if done correctly...
I can not see my error here and am wondering what the issue is.
> > However I am way way open to suggestion here.
>
> You ne
> nope. Been there .. done that and that fails badly .. in fact worse than
> before :
Yet this is the standard way and works flawlessly if done correctly...
> However I am way way open to suggestion here.
You need to configure everything with --build=sparc64-sun-solaris2.10 and
compile everythi
> > Any pointers at all as to the error of my ways ?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
nope. Been there .. done that and that fails badly .. in fact worse than before
:
Configure .. look good but lies :
$ ../gcc-4.7.2/configure --build=sparc64-sun-solaris2.10
> Any pointers at all as to the error of my ways ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc64-x-solaris2
--
Eric Botcazou
18 matches
Mail list logo
