On 11 January 2012 14:49, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely writes:
>
>> I'm not sure why "@true" is needed, as I think GNU make allows simply
>> ";" for an empty recipe, maybe Ian can explain that part.
>
> The rules I described work for all versions of make. It's quite
Thanks, I wonder
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> I'm not sure why "@true" is needed, as I think GNU make allows simply
> ";" for an empty recipe, maybe Ian can explain that part.
The rules I described work for all versions of make. It's quite
possible that with GNU make the "@true" is unnecessary.
Ian
On 11 January 2012 09:08, Mingjie Xing wrote:
> 2012/1/10 Ian Lance Taylor :
>> Stamp files in make work like this:
>>
>> FILE: STAMP-FILE; @true
>> STAMP-FILE: DEPENDENCIES
>> commands to create FILE.tmp
>> move-if-change FILE.tmp FILE
>> touch $@
>>
>> What this says is: if a
2012/1/10 Ian Lance Taylor :
> Stamp files in make work like this:
>
> FILE: STAMP-FILE; @true
> STAMP-FILE: DEPENDENCIES
> commands to create FILE.tmp
> move-if-change FILE.tmp FILE
> touch $@
>
> What this says is: if any of DEPENDENCIES change, then run the commands
> to cre
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:12:50AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Basile Starynkevitch writes:
>>
>> > I am fighting against makefile issues on the GCC MELT branch.
>> >
>> > Much more details are given in
>> >http://stackoverflow.com/q/8727896/841108
>> >
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:12:50AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Basile Starynkevitch writes:
>
> > I am fighting against makefile issues on the GCC MELT branch.
> >
> > Much more details are given in
> >http://stackoverflow.com/q/8727896/841108
> > and in
> >http://lists.gnu.org/arc
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
> I am fighting against makefile issues on the GCC MELT branch.
>
> Much more details are given in
>http://stackoverflow.com/q/8727896/841108
> and in
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-make/2012-01/msg00017.html
>
> So (unless you ask) I won't repeat t
