On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 14:22 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
> so I have a good news and a bad news
>
> good news is that I was successfully able to split the calls at every
> call-site during the creation of super-graph.
>
> I did it by simply adding an 'else’ statement where analyser handles
> split
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 15 2021, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote:
>
[...]
>
> Are you perhaps building the first stage using clang, or a very old
> gcc? That would likely generate very different debuginfo, which might
> explain the differences in behavior that you're seeing in gdb.
>
> If I run into proble
On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 19:42 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
>
>
> > On 13-Jun-2021, at 8:22 PM, David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 19:11 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 08-Jun-2021, at 11:24 PM, David Malcolm
> > > > mailto:dmalc...@redhat.com>>
> > > > wrote:
>
On Sun, 2021-06-13 at 19:11 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
>
>
> > On 08-Jun-2021, at 11:24 PM, David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
> > Is there a URL for your branch?
>
> no, currently it only local branch on my machine. Should I upload it on
> a hosting site ( like GitHub ) ? or can I create a branch on
> On 08-Jun-2021, at 11:24 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> Is there a URL for your branch?
no, currently it only local branch on my machine. Should I upload it on a
hosting site ( like GitHub ) ? or can I create a branch on remote also ?
> The issue is that the analyzer currently divides calls
On Tue, 2021-06-08 at 21:20 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
>
>
> > On 01-Jun-2021, at 6:38 PM, David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> >
[...snip...]
> > Maybe it's best to have an
> > account on the GCC compile farm for this:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm
> > IIRC you already have such an account.
> On 01-Jun-2021, at 6:38 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>
> - able to build the analyzer from source *quickly*, for hacking on the
> code. i.e. with --disable-bootstrap. We want to minimize the time it
> takes to, say, hack in a print statement into a single .cc file in the
> analyzer subdirector
On Sun, 2021-05-30 at 20:38 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
> hello
Hi Ankur, sorry about the delayed reply (it was a long weekend here in
the US)
> I was successfully able to build gcc with bootstrapping disabled and
> using xgcc directly from the build directory instead ( reducing the
> overall buil
