On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 06:23:13PM -0400, Robert Dewar wrote:
> Joe Buck wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 02:54:26PM +0100, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> >>Couldn't the plugin interface require a copyrighted passphrase to be
> >>sent by the plugin when it registeres, and the passphrase can then
> >>be l
Joe Buck wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 02:54:26PM +0100, Joern Rennecke wrote:
Couldn't the plugin interface require a copyrighted passphrase to be
sent by the plugin when it registeres, and the passphrase can then
be licensed under the GPL.
Please, let's stop this.
Actually the above is a
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 02:54:26PM +0100, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> Couldn't the plugin interface require a copyrighted passphrase to be
> sent by the plugin when it registeres, and the passphrase can then
> be licensed under the GPL.
Please, let's stop this.
Joern Rennecke wrote:
Couldn't the plugin interface require a copyrighted passphrase to be
sent by the plugin when it registeres, and the passphrase can then
be licensed under the GPL. Thus, plugins that want to interface with
an official FSF gcc will have to be GPLed in order to talk to the
plu
