Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> So I still don't understand why generating cross-reference
> documentation with Doxygen for C++ code is permitted, while
> generating cross-reference documentation witb ÂMELT for MELT code is
> prohibited.
As far as I know, nobody said that.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wik
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 01:57:03PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>
> >> Meanwhile, I think we should try to make use of the fact that RMS is
> >> permitting auto-generated reference documentation (which I have been
> >> instructed not to call a manual) using JavaDoc/Dox
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:46:26PM +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> Please also explain who should I contact, and how? Please also explain
> how the GNU Emacs is generated. I guess it is by a software of the GNU
> emacs package.
Sorry for the typo, I mean
"how the GNU emacs documentation
Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>> Meanwhile, I think we should try to make use of the fact that RMS is
>> permitting auto-generated reference documentation (which I have been
>> instructed not to call a manual) using JavaDoc/Doxygen tools. If we use
>> those tools, and demonstrate their value, we're
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 12:11:01PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
> I think that "literate programming" approaches (whether the full Knuth
> version, or the more mild JavaDoc version, or auto-extraction of
> command-line options or whatever) are valuable. RMS, based on my
> communications with him
