On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:56:33AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.target/i386/asm-rename-1.c: New file.
>
> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/asm-rename-1.c
> ===
> --- /dev/null 2013-10-09 10:21:20.
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:59:35AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> I see, the previous implementation tricked the one-declaration rule by
>> introducing two names. What made the difference is that the second name
>> is expanded as builtin...
>>
>> So you don't have __bulitin_
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 10:59:35AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> I see, the previous implementation tricked the one-declaration rule by
> introducing two names. What made the difference is that the second name
> is expanded as builtin...
>
> So you don't have __bulitin_sync_synchronize() at hand th
> Jan Hubicka writes:
> >> MIPS16 code can't do atomic operations directly, so it calls into
> >> out-of-line
> >> versions that are compiled as -mno-mips16. These out-of-line versions use
> >> the same open-coded implementation as you'd get in normal -mno-mips16 code.
> >
> > Hmm, and I assume
Jan Hubicka writes:
>> MIPS16 code can't do atomic operations directly, so it calls into out-of-line
>> versions that are compiled as -mno-mips16. These out-of-line versions use
>> the same open-coded implementation as you'd get in normal -mno-mips16 code.
>
> Hmm, and I assume you don't want to
> MIPS16 code can't do atomic operations directly, so it calls into out-of-line
> versions that are compiled as -mno-mips16. These out-of-line versions use
> the same open-coded implementation as you'd get in normal -mno-mips16 code.
Hmm, and I assume you don't want to use target attribute for th
