On 18/01/16 20:42, Richard Biener wrote:
I have (very incomplete) prototype patches to do a dominator-based
approach instead (what is refered to downthread as non-iterating approach).
That's cheaper and is what I'd like to provide as an "utility style" interface
to things liker niter analysis whi
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Kugan
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> >> Another potential use of value ranges is the profile estimation.
>>> >> http://www.lighterra.com/papers/valuerang
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Kugan
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> >> Another potential use of value ranges is the profile estimation.
>> >> http://www.lighterra.com/papers/valuerangeprop/Patterson1995-ValueRangeProp.pdf
>> >> It seems to me
On 19/01/16 04:10, Jan Hubicka wrote:
In general, given that we have existing VRP implementation I would suggest
first implementing the IPA propagation and profile estimation bits using
existing VRP pass and then try to compare the simple dominator based approach
with the VRP we have and see wh
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Kugan
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Another potential use of value ranges is the profile estimation.
> >> http://www.lighterra.com/papers/valuerangeprop/Patterson1995-ValueRangeProp.pdf
> >> It seems to me that we may want to have something that can feed sane loop
>
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Kugan
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Another potential use of value ranges is the profile estimation.
>> http://www.lighterra.com/papers/valuerangeprop/Patterson1995-ValueRangeProp.pdf
>> It seems to me that we may want to have something that can feed sane loop
>> bounds for p
Vivek Pandya
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:35 AM, vivek pandya wrote:
> Vivek Pandya
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Kugan
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Hello I am Vivek Pandya, I am actually working on a GSoC 2016 proposal
>> > for his work and it is very similar to extending ipa-cp pass. I am also
Vivek Pandya
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 4:16 AM, Kugan
wrote:
>
>
> > Hello I am Vivek Pandya, I am actually working on a GSoC 2016 proposal
> > for his work and it is very similar to extending ipa-cp pass. I am also
> > in touch with Jan Hubicka.
>
> Hi Vivek,
>
> Glad to know that you are plannin
Hi,
> Another potential use of value ranges is the profile estimation.
> http://www.lighterra.com/papers/valuerangeprop/Patterson1995-ValueRangeProp.pdf
> It seems to me that we may want to have something that can feed sane loop
> bounds for profile estimation as well and we can easily store the
> Hello I am Vivek Pandya, I am actually working on a GSoC 2016 proposal
> for his work and it is very similar to extending ipa-cp pass. I am also
> in touch with Jan Hubicka.
Hi Vivek,
Glad to know that you are planning to work on this. Could you please put
you plan in an accessible place (or p
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Kugan
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am looking at implementing a ipa vrp pass. Jan Hubicka also talks
> > about this in 2013 GNU Cauldron as one of the optimization he would like
> > to see in gcc. So my question is, is any one implementing it. If not we
> > wou
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Kugan
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I am looking at implementing a ipa vrp pass. Jan Hubicka also talks
>> > about this in 2013 GNU Cauldron as one of the optimization he would like
>> > to see in
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Kugan
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am looking at implementing a ipa vrp pass. Jan Hubicka also talks
> about this in 2013 GNU Cauldron as one of the optimization he would like
> to see in gcc. So my question is, is any one implementing it. If not we
> would like to do th
13 matches
Mail list logo
