On 19 May 2016 at 13:19, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 18 May 2016 at 19:38, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Wed, 18 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 17 May 2016 at 18:36, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, 11 May 2016, Pratham
On Thu, 19 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 18 May 2016 at 19:38, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> On 17 May 2016 at 18:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 11 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 6 May 2016 at 17:2
On 18 May 2016 at 19:38, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 17 May 2016 at 18:36, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Wed, 11 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 6 May 2016 at 17:20, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > You can't simply use
On Wed, 18 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 17 May 2016 at 18:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> On 6 May 2016 at 17:20, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> >
> >> > You can't simply use
> >> >
> >> > + offset = int_byte_position (field);
On 17 May 2016 at 18:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 6 May 2016 at 17:20, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >
>> > You can't simply use
>> >
>> > + offset = int_byte_position (field);
>> >
>> > as it can be placed at variable offset which will make
On Wed, 11 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 17:20, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > You can't simply use
> >
> > + offset = int_byte_position (field);
> >
> > as it can be placed at variable offset which will make int_byte_position
> > ICE. Note it also returns a truncat
ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-05/msg00120.html
Thanks,
Prathamesh
On 11 May 2016 at 15:39, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 17:20, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>> On 23 February 2016 at 21:49, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 6 May 2016 at 17:20, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 23 February 2016 at 21:49, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> wrote:
>> > On 23 February 2016 at 17:31, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On 22 Februa
On Wed, 4 May 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 23 February 2016 at 21:49, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> > On 23 February 2016 at 17:31, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 22 February 2016 at 17:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> > On Mon,
On 23 February 2016 at 21:49, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On 23 February 2016 at 17:31, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 February 2016 at 17:36, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi Richa
On 23 February 2016 at 22:11, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:49:37PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c b/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c
>> index 2b25b45..a6af535 100644
>> --- a/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c
>> +++ b/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c
>> @@ -794,6 +794
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 09:49:37PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c b/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c
> index 2b25b45..a6af535 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c
> @@ -794,6 +794,75 @@ make_pass_slp_vectorize (gcc::context *ctxt)
>
On 23 February 2016 at 17:31, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> On 22 February 2016 at 17:36, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Richard,
>> >> As discussed in private mail, this version of patch atte
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On 22 February 2016 at 17:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Richard,
> >> As discussed in private mail, this version of patch attempts to
> >> increase alignment
> >> of global struct decl if
On 22 February 2016 at 17:36, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>> As discussed in private mail, this version of patch attempts to
>> increase alignment
>> of global struct decl if it contains an an array field(s) and array's
>> offset is a mu
On Mon, 22 Feb 2016, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> As discussed in private mail, this version of patch attempts to
> increase alignment
> of global struct decl if it contains an an array field(s) and array's
> offset is a multiple of the alignment of vector type corresponding to
> it'
16 matches
Mail list logo