Andrew Pinski writes:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Alex wrote:
>> If I understood correct, gcc could replace insns 5, 7, 8 and 9 by the insn
>> defined as "*and_2", but it seems "combine" did not tried that.
>
> Yes you missed that combine in GCC only acts on 3 insns at a time.
> Though th
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Alex wrote:
> If I understood correct, gcc could replace insns 5, 7, 8 and 9 by the insn
> defined as "*and_2", but it seems "combine" did not tried that.
Yes you missed that combine in GCC only acts on 3 insns at a time.
Though that has changed in GCC 4.6 and abo
