RE: gcc 4.5.0 libiberty .o vs. .obj confusion

2010-05-05 Thread Jay K
s required configure.ac:3: the top level autom4te: /usr/bin/gm4 failed with exit status: 63 jbook2:libiberty jay$  - Jay > From: jay.krell@ > To: i...@m > CC: g...@g > Subject: RE: gcc 4.5.0 libiberty .o vs. .obj confusion > Date: Wed,

RE: gcc 4.5.0 libiberty .o vs. .obj confusion

2010-05-05 Thread Jay K
> CC: gcc@ > From: iant@ > > Jay: >> I'm guessing that every ".o" in libiberty/Makefile.in should be changed to >> $(OBJEXT). > > Yes. > > Ian Thanks. Specifically ".o" goes to "@objext@". There's no way I'm going to be able to get "the papers" in. I can try to squeak by via triviality of

Re: gcc 4.5.0 libiberty .o vs. .obj confusion

2010-05-03 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Jay K writes: > I'm guessing that every ".o" in libiberty/Makefile.in should be changed to > $(OBJEXT). Yes. Ian

RE: gcc 4.5.0 libiberty .o vs. .obj confusion

2010-05-03 Thread Jay K
I'm guessing that every ".o" in libiberty/Makefile.in should be changed to $(OBJEXT). Thanks,  - Jay > From: jay.kr...@cornell.edu > To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: gcc 4.5.0 libiberty .o vs. .obj confusion > Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 11:29:15 + > > > bui