On 2005-04-18, at 04:37, Gareth Pearce wrote:
So I just started trying out gcc 4.1 - with a program which compiles
and
runs fine on gcc 3.3.
Attached is a reduced testcase which shows runtime segfault due to
stack
overflow if compiled with 4.1 but does not with 3.3. Trivial work
around is
to m
Thanks for the verification!
Regards,
Gareth Pearce
>
>
> On Apr 17, 2005, at 10:37 PM, Gareth Pearce wrote:
>
> > So I just started trying out gcc 4.1 - with a program which compiles
> > and
> > runs fine on gcc 3.3.
> >
> > Attached is a reduced testcase which shows runtime segfault due to
>
On Apr 17, 2005, at 10:37 PM, Gareth Pearce wrote:
So I just started trying out gcc 4.1 - with a program which compiles
and
runs fine on gcc 3.3.
Attached is a reduced testcase which shows runtime segfault due to
stack
overflow if compiled with 4.1 but does not with 3.3. Trivial work
around is
