Re: extension to -fdump-tree-*-raw

2005-07-24 Thread Ebke, Hans-Christian
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Gabriel Dos Reis [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Giovanni Bajo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Ebke, Hans-Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > | > I have to write this in Outlook, so I don't even try to get the > quoting > | > right. Sorry. :-( >

Re: extension to -fdump-tree-*-raw

2005-07-22 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
"Giovanni Bajo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ebke, Hans-Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | > I have to write this in Outlook, so I don't even try to get the quoting | > right. Sorry. :-( | | http://jump.to/outlook-quotefix | | > But it would break applications relying on the old format

Re: extension to -fdump-tree-*-raw

2005-07-22 Thread Giovanni Bajo
Ebke, Hans-Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have to write this in Outlook, so I don't even try to get the quoting > right. Sorry. :-( http://jump.to/outlook-quotefix > But it would break applications relying on the old format. There is no format either. dump-tree is *very* specific of

Re: extension to -fdump-tree-*-raw

2005-07-22 Thread Giovanni Bajo
Ebke, Hans-Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So to resolve that problem I took the gcc 4.0.1 source code and patched > tree.h and tree-dump.c. The patched version introduces two new options for > -fdump-tree: The "parseable" option which produces unambiguous and easier to > parse but otherwis