Re: c++ default operators

2005-09-23 Thread David Daney
Joe Buck wrote: Another extra function people sometimes complain about is the two copies of the constructor: the in-charge version is for constructing an instance of the class, and the not-in-charge version is for initializing the base portion of a derived class. Getting rid of the not-in-charg

Re: c++ default operators

2005-09-23 Thread Joe Buck
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 07:09:21PM +0200, Tommy Vercetti wrote: > I was told that gcc by default, for every class creates operator =, and > probably something else. This makes binary file bit larger than it > suppose to be. Is it true, and if so, why this is the case ? Can gcc > simply not generate