Re: about new_regalloc

2005-04-01 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, zouq wrote: > in gcc3.4.1,i found rest_of_new_handle_regalloc > why in gcc4.0, it has been removed? It was removed from gcc 4 because it bitrotted and broke on all kinds of code. If you want to see a more recent and more working version look at the new-regalloc-branch

Re: about new_regalloc

2005-03-30 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Mar 30, 2005, at 9:51 PM, zouq wrote: in gcc3.4.1,i found rest_of_new_handle_regalloc why in gcc4.0, it has been removed? or haved changed its name? because new-ra was ICEing on almost all target and almost all sources. -- Pinski