On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> It seems to me that e-mail to gcc-b...@gcc.gnu.org is basically lost
> in the noise. It seems to me that we should not recommend that people
> send bug reports there; the chances that anything will happen are much
> smaller than the already small cha
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> It seems to me that e-mail to gcc-b...@gcc.gnu.org is basically lost in
> the noise. It seems to me that we should not recommend that people send
> bug reports there; the chances that anything will happen are much
> smaller than the already small chance that anybody will
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Manuel
López-Ibáñez wrote:
> But they go to the mailing list or are they tracked by bugzilla? If
> they go to the mailing list, we should probably still remove the
> reference to gccbug, (Not gccbug itself, which can still be used by
> experienced developers).
They
2009/7/23 Andrew Pinski :
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Manuel
> López-Ibáñez wrote:
>> And from gccbug?
>
> I do know of one maintainer to GCC that still uses gccbug. And he
> does file good bug reports even with gccbug.
>
> Besides him, we get at maybe 1 bug reported by gccbug every three m
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Manuel
López-Ibáñez wrote:
> And from gccbug?
I do know of one maintainer to GCC that still uses gccbug. And he
does file good bug reports even with gccbug.
Besides him, we get at maybe 1 bug reported by gccbug every three months.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
2009/7/23 Andrew Pinski :
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> It seems to me that e-mail to gcc-b...@gcc.gnu.org is basically lost in
>> the noise. It seems to me that we should not recommend that people send
>> bug reports there; the chances that anything will happen ar
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> It seems to me that e-mail to gcc-b...@gcc.gnu.org is basically lost in
> the noise. It seems to me that we should not recommend that people send
> bug reports there; the chances that anything will happen are much
> smaller than the alrea