Re: Thread safe functions from the C standard library

2008-12-09 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
David Livshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I thought that "gcc" mailing list is appropriate as I need this > information in order to implement auto-parallelizer for the > gcc-generated code. How the gcc-supported parallelizer ( > "-ftree-parallelize-loops=n" ) treats the calls to library routines

Re: Thread safe functions from the C standard library

2008-12-09 Thread David Livshin
Ian Lance Taylor wrote: David Livshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: What functions from the GNU's C standard library ( libc ) are thread safe? Of a particular interest are transcendental functions ( like exp', 'sin' etc. ) - are they thread safe? Are there any requirements/guidelines/assuranc

Re: Thread safe functions from the C standard library

2008-12-09 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
David Livshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What functions from the GNU's C standard library ( libc ) are thread > safe? Of a particular interest are transcendental functions ( like > exp', 'sin' etc. ) - are they thread safe? > > Are there any requirements/guidelines/assurances regarding thread >