Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> I have these patches against 4.3.2/4.3.3 that should help with this.
>> (Sorry Eric, I've been too busy with the cygwin gcc distro releases to
>> start feeding these upstream yet, but they need to wait for 4.5 anyway.
>> They're not all in entirely suitable shape yet eit
> I have these patches against 4.3.2/4.3.3 that should help with this.
> (Sorry Eric, I've been too busy with the cygwin gcc distro releases to
> start feeding these upstream yet, but they need to wait for 4.5 anyway.
> They're not all in entirely suitable shape yet either.)
Thanks for steppin
Rainer Emrich wrote:
> Eric Botcazou schrieb:
>>> For the acats tests most of the FAIL cases ar of the form:
>>> violation of restriction "NO_IMPLICIT_DYNAMIC_CODE" at system.ads:44
>> This very likely means that the compiler is misconfigured. Try to replace
>> "cygwin32" with "cygwin" in ada/gcc-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Botcazou schrieb:
>> For the acats tests most of the FAIL cases ar of the form:
>> violation of restriction "NO_IMPLICIT_DYNAMIC_CODE" at system.ads:44
>
> This very likely means that the compiler is misconfigured. Try to replace
> "cygwin32" wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Botcazou schrieb:
>> For the acats tests most of the FAIL cases ar of the form:
>> violation of restriction "NO_IMPLICIT_DYNAMIC_CODE" at system.ads:44
>
> This very likely means that the compiler is misconfigured. Try to replace
> "cygwin32" wi
> For the acats tests most of the FAIL cases ar of the form:
> violation of restriction "NO_IMPLICIT_DYNAMIC_CODE" at system.ads:44
This very likely means that the compiler is misconfigured. Try to replace
"cygwin32" with "cygwin" in ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in and rebuild the
runtime (make al
