On 5/25/12, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 25 May 2012 21:26, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > - Some files give syntax errors when compiled in isolation
> > because they are missing symbols. for example, ext/algorithm
> > needs __gnu_cxx::is_sorted.
>
> I'm not sure what this refers to ( either
> defines __
On 25 May 2012 21:26, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> - Some files give syntax errors when compiled in isolation because they are
> missing symbols. for example, ext/algorithm needs __gnu_cxx::is_sorted.
I'm not sure what this refers to ( either defines
__gnu_cxx::is_sorted or has a using declaration for
On 5/25/12, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 12-05-25 14:54 , Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 May 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > > On 12-05-25 12:25 , Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > On 05/25/2012 11:37 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > > > and it should be possible to eliminate the __need_*
> > > > >
On 12-05-25 14:54 , Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 12-05-25 12:25 , Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/25/2012 11:37 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
and it should be possible to eliminate the __need_* special cases
for some system headers by having more, smaller header
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 12-05-25 12:25 , Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 05/25/2012 11:37 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > and it should be possible to eliminate the __need_* special cases
> > > for some system headers by having more, smaller headers set up to define
> > > indiv
On 12-05-25 12:25 , Jason Merrill wrote:
On 05/25/2012 11:37 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
and it should be possible to eliminate the __need_* special cases
for some system headers by having more, smaller headers set up to define
individual types.
I was thinking the same thing.
Yes. Increased
On 05/25/2012 11:37 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
and it should be possible to eliminate the __need_* special cases
for some system headers by having more, smaller headers set up to define
individual types.
I was thinking the same thing.
Jason
On Thu, 24 May 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> The document is at:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/pph?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=pph-in-gcc.pdf
One thing I wonder from this document is whether there are changes it
would be useful to make to system headers (both in GCC and in glibc) to
improve mod
Geez, we can't attach pdf files on message to the list.
The document is at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/pph?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=pph-in-gcc.pdf
Diego.
