Re: Status of GCC 6 on x86_64 (Debian)

2016-02-03 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2016.02.03 at 01:13 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 22.01.2016 08:27, Matthias Klose wrote: > >On 22.01.2016 06:09, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > >>In terms of build failures, I reported 520 bugs to Debian. Most of them > >>were new GCC errors or warnings (some packages use -Werror and many > >>-

Re: Status of GCC 6 on x86_64 (Debian)

2016-02-02 Thread Matthias Klose
On 22.01.2016 08:27, Matthias Klose wrote: On 22.01.2016 06:09, Martin Michlmayr wrote: In terms of build failures, I reported 520 bugs to Debian. Most of them were new GCC errors or warnings (some packages use -Werror and many -Werror=format-security). Here are some of the most frequent error

Re: Status of GCC 6 on x86_64 (Debian)

2016-01-26 Thread David Malcolm
On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 08:27 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 22.01.2016 06:09, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > In terms of build failures, I reported 520 bugs to Debian. Most of them > > were new GCC errors or warnings (some packages use -Werror and many > > -Werror=format-security). > > > > Here are

Re: Status of GCC 6 on x86_64 (Debian)

2016-01-22 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2016.01.22 at 11:27 -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Martin Michlmayr [2016-01-21 21:09]: > > * 13: test suite failures (segfaults and similar); not clear if the > > package or if GCC is at fault. > > Rene Engelhard pointed me to > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69327 > whic

Re: Status of GCC 6 on x86_64 (Debian)

2016-01-22 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Martin Michlmayr [2016-01-21 21:09]: > * 13: test suite failures (segfaults and similar); not clear if the > package or if GCC is at fault. Rene Engelhard pointed me to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69327 which might explain some of these segfaults. -- Martin Michlmayr Linux

Re: Status of GCC 6 on x86_64 (Debian)

2016-01-21 Thread Matthias Klose
On 22.01.2016 06:09, Martin Michlmayr wrote: In terms of build failures, I reported 520 bugs to Debian. Most of them were new GCC errors or warnings (some packages use -Werror and many -Werror=format-security). Here are some of the most frequent errors see: [...] Martin tagged these issues; h