Rod Evans wrote:
Lu, Hongjiu wrote:
It looks like SHF_EXCLUDE is exactly what I am looking for. How useful
is it in your experiences?
As far as I can tell, this was introduced with the SYSTEM V APPLICATION
BINARY INTERFACE for the PowerPC Processor Supplement back in
September 1995 :-)
Then
Lu, Hongjiu wrote:
It looks like SHF_EXCLUDE is exactly what I am looking for. How useful
is it in your experiences?
As far as I can tell, this was introduced with the SYSTEM V APPLICATION
BINARY INTERFACE for the PowerPC Processor Supplement back in
September 1995 :-)
Then the Fortran folks
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: RFC: Mark a section to be discarded for DSO and executable
>
>
>H. J. Lu wrote:
>> With LTO, an object file may contain sections with IL, which
>> can be discarded when building DSO and e
H. J. Lu wrote:
With LTO, an object file may contain sections with IL, which
can be discarded when building DSO and executable. Currently we can't
mark such sections with gABI. With GNU linker, we can use a
linker script to discard such sections. But it will be more generic
to make a section to b
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:09:35AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> That is not strictly required for LTO as I see it. With LTO, the lto
> program is going to read the .o files with the IL information. It
> will then generate a new .s file to pass to the assembler. The IL
> information will n
On 09 Jan 2007 10:09:35 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With LTO, an object file may contain sections with IL, which
> can be discarded when building DSO and executable. Currently we can't
> mark such sections with gABI. With GNU linker
"H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With LTO, an object file may contain sections with IL, which
> can be discarded when building DSO and executable. Currently we can't
> mark such sections with gABI. With GNU linker, we can use a
> linker script to discard such sections. But it will be more
