Re: REAL(16) ...on x86/x86-64

2008-08-25 Thread Steve Kargl
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:09:12PM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 03:15:42PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > >>On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:50:16PM +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: > REAL(16) needs to be done in software -- on x86, x86-64 -- as it is not

Re: REAL(16) ...on x86/x86-64

2008-08-25 Thread Jerry DeLisle
Steve Kargl wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 03:15:42PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:50:16PM +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: REAL(16) needs to be done in software -- on x86, x86-64 -- as it is not supported in hardware; if you want to use more than REAL(8) on x86, x86-64