From: "Ben Elliston"
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 23:56 -0400, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
Ah, but cake is only easy when someone else bakes it. :-)
While you're baking, Kaveh :-) could you see if your patch could also
fix:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34818
Thanks, Ben
I don't think
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 23:56 -0400, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> Ah, but cake is only easy when someone else bakes it. :-)
While you're baking, Kaveh :-) could you see if your patch could also
fix:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34818
Thanks, Ben
"Kaveh R. GHAZI" writes:
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> Add a new shell variable in configure.ac extra_mpfr_configure_args. Set
>> it to what you want to pass to the mpfr configure. Call
>> AC_SUBST(extra_mpfr_configure_args). In Makefile.in add a line
>> EXTRA_MPFR_CONFIG
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Add a new shell variable in configure.ac extra_mpfr_configure_args. Set
> it to what you want to pass to the mpfr configure. Call
> AC_SUBST(extra_mpfr_configure_args). In Makefile.in add a line
> EXTRA_MPFR_CONFIGURE_ARGS = @extra_mpfr_configure_a
"Kaveh R. GHAZI" writes:
> What I would like to see is that the extra_configure_flags for mpfr
> actually check whether gmp is being built in-tree before passing
> --with-gmp-build=foo to mpfr's configure. But I don't get how to do that.
> If the mpfr case could be fixed, I could then copy the m
