Re: Question about -moutline-atomic under -mcmodel-large

2020-09-17 Thread Florian Weimer via Gcc
* Florian Weimer: > * Bin Cheng via Gcc: > >> Last question is why do we have __aarch64_have_lse_atomics(and some >> other symbols) in both libgcc and glibc? >> >> #objdump -t /usr/lib64/libc.so.6 | grep "__aarch64_ldadd" >> >> 00111460 l F .text 0030 >> __aarch64_ldadd8_a

Re: Question about -moutline-atomic under -mcmodel-large

2020-09-17 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:56:59PM +0200, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote: > * Bin Cheng via Gcc: > > > Last question is why do we have __aarch64_have_lse_atomics(and some > > other symbols) in both libgcc and glibc? > > > > #objdump -t /usr/lib64/libc.so.6 | grep "__aarch64_ldadd" > > > > 00

Re: Question about -moutline-atomic under -mcmodel-large

2020-09-17 Thread Florian Weimer via Gcc
* Bin Cheng via Gcc: > Last question is why do we have __aarch64_have_lse_atomics(and some > other symbols) in both libgcc and glibc? > > #objdump -t /usr/lib64/libc.so.6 | grep "__aarch64_ldadd" > > 00111460 l F .text 0030 > __aarch64_ldadd8_acq > > 00111370 l