Re: Preserving bootstrap with non-GCC compilers

2006-03-05 Thread Eric Botcazou
> You just have to write the test in the toplevel configure.in, and place > it just before the AC_SUBST(stage1_cflags). Thanks! > The maintainers may think it different, but I won't see anything wrong > in having a simpler > >if test "$GCC" = yes; then > stage1_cflags="${stage1_cflags} -

Re: Preserving bootstrap with non-GCC compilers

2006-03-02 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Comments? I'm of course also volunteering to write the patch, provided that an adept at the new bootstrap (black) magic gives me a clue as to where I should start. :-) You just have to write the test in the toplevel configure.in, and place it just before the AC_SUBST(stage1_cflags). The m

Re: Preserving bootstrap with non-GCC compilers

2006-03-01 Thread Jeffrey A Law
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 08:15 +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a big fan of Zack's "over-my-dead-body" motto when it comes to ditching > bootstrap with non-GCC compilers. :-) It turns out that bootstrap is again > broken on mainline for them (at least Sun CC) and that the problem is anot

Re: Preserving bootstrap with non-GCC compilers

2006-03-01 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | Comments? Go for it! -- Gaby