Jim Wilson wrote:
> JoseD wrote:
> > @James
> > What do you mean by 16.3.3/3? GCC's version ?
>
> This is a reference to the ISO C standard.
No. It's a reference to the ISO C++ standard. 16.3.3/3
includes the sentence "If the result [of the ## operator] is
not a valid preprocessing token, the
JoseD wrote:
@James
What do you mean by 16.3.3/3? GCC's version ?
This is a reference to the ISO C standard.
Still don't see what the problem whith 2 tokens is...
The problem is the fact that they are 2 tokens. You can do a ## b to
create ab, but you can not do a ## ( to create a( becaus
@NullHeart
Yes, but this is just a small code snippet reproducing the problem, I don't
think that will work when pasting with a macro's argument is required..
@James
What do you mean by 16.3.3/3? GCC's version ?
Still don't see what the problem whith 2 tokens is...
Shame that there doesn't s
JoseD wrote:
> Hi. Just wanted to share that the following macro gives an error on latest
> versions of GCC, but is reported to work on 2.95.3 (tested on MorphOS but
> should be the same for other OSses of course).
> Both an old version of SASC(AmigaOS) and Borland (on X86) worked fine.
>
> #inclu
You could just remove the '##'.
Soma
On 3/30/07, JoseD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi. Just wanted to share that the following macro gives an error on latest
versions of GCC, but is reported to work on 2.95.3 (tested on MorphOS but
should be the same for other OSses of course).
Both an old vers
