* Alan Modra:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:14:12AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Alan Modra:
>>
>> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:37:29AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> >> * Alan Modra:
>> >>
>> >> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 09:42:52AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> >> > We've been discussing
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:14:12AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Alan Modra:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:37:29AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> * Alan Modra:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 09:42:52AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> > We've been discussing this inside IBM too. T
* Alan Modra:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:37:29AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Alan Modra:
>>
>> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 09:42:52AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> >> At Cauldron, the question came up whether the dynamic loader needs to
>> >> be taught about the new relocations for PC-rel
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:37:29AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Alan Modra:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 09:42:52AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> At Cauldron, the question came up whether the dynamic loader needs to
> >> be taught about the new relocations for PC-relative addressing.
> >>
* Alan Modra:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 09:42:52AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> At Cauldron, the question came up whether the dynamic loader needs to
>> be taught about the new relocations for PC-relative addressing.
>>
>> I think they would only matter if we supported PC-relative addressing
>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 09:42:52AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> At Cauldron, the question came up whether the dynamic loader needs to
> be taught about the new relocations for PC-relative addressing.
>
> I think they would only matter if we supported PC-relative addressing
> *and* text relocatio
