Re: PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort]

2007-09-28 Thread Geoffrey Keating
"Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 23 August 2007 22:34, Mark Mitchell wrote: > > > I do think that generating the same code, independent of host system, is > > a very important property of GCC's design, just like generating the same > > code independent of whether or not we're compilin

RE: PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort]

2007-09-16 Thread Dave Korn
On 17 September 2007 00:28, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> Dave Korn wrote: I do think that generating the same code, independent of host system, is a very important property of GCC's design, just like generating the same code independent of whe

Re: PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort]

2007-09-16 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Dave Korn wrote: >>> I do think that generating the same code, independent of host system, is >>> a very important property of GCC's design, just like generating the same >>> code independent of whether or not we're compiling with -g. >> Can the SC plea

Re: PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort]

2007-08-28 Thread Mark Mitchell
Dave Korn wrote: > On 23 August 2007 22:34, Mark Mitchell wrote: > >> I do think that generating the same code, independent of host system, is >> a very important property of GCC's design, just like generating the same >> code independent of whether or not we're compiling with -g. > > Hear, h