Re: Optimizing C++ Move Functions in Stl

2018-12-13 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 12/12/18 15:05 -0500, nick wrote: On 2018-12-12 10:24 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 12/12/18 17:17 +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote: On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 17:14, nick wrote: > I think there's an attempt to ascertain that mostly constructors and > assignment operators need noexcept-fixe

Re: Optimizing C++ Move Functions in Stl

2018-12-12 Thread nick
On 2018-12-12 10:24 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 12/12/18 17:17 +0200, Ville Voutilainen wrote: >> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 17:14, nick wrote: >> >>> > I think there's an attempt to ascertain that mostly constructors and >>> > assignment operators need noexcept-fixes, >>> > because that noex

Re: Optimizing C++ Move Functions in Stl

2018-12-11 Thread nick
On 2018-12-11 8:37 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 10/12/18 16:09 -0500, nick wrote: >> Greetings All, >> >> Sorry I was busy last week but did get my forms signed off for the >> required copyright assignment. Anyhow seems that the tuple and other >> classes mentioned aren't the only only ones